|
Religious
Faith and CLV
The Center's charter
expresses a commitment to serving a supreme moral being, and its 501(c)3 tax
exemption was awarded partly on the basis of its religious mission.
Unfortunately, religion turns out to be a prickly subject handled by too
many with silence and evasion. No matter could be more important than the
ultimate purpose of human life, and no fact of our existence more immediately
transparent than the body's mortality. If such issues are avoided because
they may create discomfort, then what claim can any ensuing discussion have to
depth and enduring value?

At the same time--and with the intent of encouraging discussions that must take
place in the search for the good life--we do not shy away from
controversy. Besides the ill-focused raillery of ivory-tower nihilists
(who tend to be more argumentative than analytical), we have also drawn
occasional criticism from those who accuse our faith of being too hesitant or
fragmentary. In particular, what has been called neo-orthodoxy has
disseminated the position with increasing success throughout our society since
World War II that the Bible is the only source of Christian truth, that its
truth is expressed with literal and indubitable clarity, and that indicating a
biblical passage is the necessary and sufficient justification for any
action. This position is not really fundamental to the Christian faith at
all; and, indeed, it has seriously disturbing consequences seldom foreseen by
its well-meaning exponents.
-
It
turns the supremely good creator into an arbitrary figure, known not through
any internal voice but only through external documentation introduced into
history by revelation. This renders the Christian faith unreachable to
those born into other traditions. That is, it debases Christianity
(from the strictly impartial vantage of human reason) to the level, as it
were, of one more loud competitor among a mob of prophets all claiming an
exclusive access to God's will and the sole possession of His word.
-
From
the perspective of motive, the neo-orthodox position vitiates the quality of the believer's
adoration. The dictates of faith are not now followed because a
personal inspiration (roughly equivalent to conscience) insists upon their
goodness and finds a delightful fulfillment of human purpose in obeying
them. Rather, the believer can "know" God only through the
cultural accident (or inscrutable destiny) of having been born into the
group entrusted with holy writ. A blunt fear of temporal misfortune,
exile from the community, and eternal torture becomes the reigning motive of
such believers--not the joy of approaching a light whose warmth emanates from
one's basic, God-created nature.
-
Human
creations--art works such as music, painting, and literature--also become
problematic in the neo-orthodox view. At best they are redundant,
redirecting their audience back to the sacred text constantly. More
often, they are anathema, the "filthy" products of cultures that
did not know the holy book or did not properly receive it. For music
and painting, a certain license may be granted which allows the artist not
to revere the sacred text explicitly. Music is naturally limited to
suggestion, while painting that goes beyond the iconic can only imply
behaviors and contexts in frozen images and sketchy clues. Literature,
however, employs a verbal medium, just as the Holy Book. A literary
text can thus be held in rigid and meticulous juxtaposition to a sacred
text--and will be openly proved to have strayed, of course, unless it is a
bland recasting of sacred narrative into contemporary form. Such stinginess flies in the face of The Center's
mission, which is both to goodness and to beauty (on the reasoning
that beauty nourishes goodness by refining the judgment).
Obviously, then, our endeavor will not be cheered in all quarters. Those
with an open hostility to faith simply pass us by: those who initially mistake
our commitment as identical to a program of narrow interpretation and tightly
monitored expression more often tell us of their chagrin. We serve what we
regard as the cause of truth and goodness, not what can be demonstrated as the
trend with the most momentum or the set of beliefs most widely endorsed.
An index of some of this site's writings on religious subjects can be found on
the rubrics page under
"Art and Faith".
|

William
Bouguereau, La Jeune Prêtresse
Courtest
of The Art Renewal Center at www.artrenewal.org.
|
Is Bouguereau's young priestess a
pagan? Almost certainly so. Is this fascinating canvas
therefore fit only for the bonfire? In medieval lore, the ancient
hero Capaneus, who built a formidable reputation in Greek myth as a
railing atheist overtly abusive of all religious customs, is uniformly
treated as a desperate character. Christian authors like Dante
viewed him not as an ally against heathenry; but as a depraved fool.
They saw the essentially self-promoting character of his arrogance and
charged him with the most extreme kind of vain pride. The
inclination to revere something beyond us and superior to us--something
whose service has a more authoritative call upon us than our petty
egotism--must surely be applauded as the root of true faith whenever it
appears in human culture or history. Quite apart from the genius
with which Bouguereau has painted the young woman's loose garb and the
sumptuous veil behind her, his priestess deserves to be admired in any
civilized art gallery because she stands sincerely, poignantly bemused
before a great mystery.
|
|